A Critical Commentary to the Judgment of the Supreme Court of 16.2.2017, Ref. I CSK 106/16
The commentary contains a presentation and evaluation of the arguments that were given by the Supreme Court to justify the thesis, according to which the press correction cannot be signed by the plenipotentiary of the interested person, but the person concerned must do so by delineating his or her own signature. In the article, attention was also paid to the motives that led the legislator to shape the formal requirements for press correction in such a way that one of its elements must be the signature, as well as other arguments allowing, in the author’s opinion, to consider the Supreme Court’s position as incorrect.